EDI, JSON, XML, Avro
for analytics and AI.

Find clinical evidence your quality reports couldn't see.

1. The momentA patient receives a screening, and the health plan receives the claim and clinical record documenting it.
2. What happens todayOnce it arrives, it still has to be mapped and prepared, which can add months before it reaches quality reporting. Details the mappings weren't designed for, like an extension or a field in an unexpected place, may never arrive at all. Coordinators work from outdated or incomplete reports and contact patients who've already received care.
3. Why it mattersQuality measures affect reimbursement and incentives. Care that never reaches reporting isn't reflected in how the plan is evaluated.
4. What's now possibleEvery detail in the claim and clinical record is discovered as it arrives and reaches reporting once it's configured, not coded, and reconciliation confirms nothing was left out. Coordinators see who's already been cared for and reach the patients who still need it.

Answer the questions you're accountable for.

1. The momentA legislator asks how much the state paid its managed care plans last year for members whose coverage should have ended.
2. What happens todayThe transactions that answer the question exist, but they sit in vendor-operated systems, and existing reports often weren't built for that question. The agency waits weeks for an answer it can't fully verify.
3. Why it mattersAgencies are accountable for payment accuracy even when vendors and plans run the systems. Medicaid improper payments reached $37 billion in fiscal year 2025, most of them because the documentation behind the payment was missing or insufficient, and 18 federal audits since 2016 have identified roughly $289 million in capitation payments made for deceased enrollees.
4. What's now possibleOnce the agency's enrollment, payment, and encounter data is in complete, reconciled tables in its own Snowflake account, an analyst can answer questions like this in days, not months, and reconciliation shows the tables match what the plans and the state actually sent. The same works for any agency that collects nested reports, from energy filings to federal child welfare reporting.

Bring on the next partner without a new mapping project.

1. The momentAn employer group changes its enrollment file, or an MGA adds a coverage field to its ACORD feed.
2. What happens todayNothing errors. The new field falls outside the mapping and waits in a backlog for a partner-specific update, while underwriting and claims work without data the partner already sent. Each partner's mapping becomes one more thing to maintain.
3. Why it mattersMore than half of insurance executives surveyed say most of their IT budget goes to keeping existing systems running, and regulators and auditors ask insurers to prove nothing was lost in transformation.
4. What's now possibleEvery partner's variation is discovered across 100% of the data, including fields nobody documented, and flagged when it arrives. It reaches the tables once it's configured, not coded, and reconciliation shows auditors nothing was dropped along the way.

Your archive has the original fields. Can you prove your systems got them too?

1. The momentA bank examiner asks a simple question: can you demonstrate that the parties in your cross-border payment messages, including the ultimate debtor and ultimate creditor when provided, made it into the systems monitoring those transactions?
2. What happens todayThe bank retains the original ISO 20022 messages, but its payment and monitoring systems work from extracts built around predefined fields. Optional fields like the ultimate parties and structured addresses arrive so inconsistently that Swift postponed its 2026 structured address deadline, and when a message carries details the mappings didn't anticipate, they're left out. The payment may have processed successfully, even though the downstream tables don't contain everything the bank received. Answering the examiner means returning to archived XML and reconstructing what arrived.
3. Why it mattersRetaining the original message is one thing. Demonstrating what reached the systems responsible for monitoring is another. New York requires the banks and other institutions it regulates to validate that complete and accurate data flows into transaction monitoring, with an annual certification signed by the board or a senior officer, and only 2 of the world's 31 largest banks fully meet the global standard for risk data.
4. What's now possibleDataPancake discovers every structure and variation across the bank's retained payment messages, generates relational tables from what it finds in the bank's own Snowflake account, and reconciles them against the retained messages. That gives the bank a complete, verifiable reference. Comparing it with downstream records shows missing fields, discrepancies and dropped messages, and supports lookbacks across years of history, without changing production payment systems.

Trace a defect to the shipments it actually touched.

1. The momentA quality problem surfaces at an OEM, and the supplier needs to know which lots and shipments are affected.
2. What happens todayThe supplier's ship notices go out in each OEM's own format (X12, EDIFACT, or VDA), with lot and serial details nested several levels deep. When those records aren't fully captured in the supplier's own tables, the link between lots and shipments is missing, so containment has to cover everything that might be affected.
3. Why it mattersUS manufacturers paid $29.2 billion in warranty claims in 2024, and every shipment pulled unnecessarily adds to the cost of a defect.
4. What's now possibleEvery OEM's version of each document is discovered, including unusual packing hierarchies and plant-level variations, and brought into one consistent set of tables. The lot and serial details are already there, so the team limits containment to the shipments the defect actually touched.

Dispute a charge with the events that prove it.

1. The momentA carrier bills detention on a freight invoice, saying the truck waited hours at the dock.
2. What happens todayThe arrival and departure events come in as EDI status messages that vary by carrier, then get reshaped into internal event streams such as Kafka. A carrier-specific status code that doesn't fit the mapping can be dropped at either step, nothing flags it, and the charge gets paid because the evidence isn't there.
3. Why it mattersBilling disputes, freight recoveries, and on-time performance depend on what actually happened, and charges on US trucking invoices have to be contested within 180 days.
4. What's now possibleBoth the raw EDI and the event streams built from it become complete tables, with every status code, charge code, and accessorial actually sent, so the two can be compared field by field. The audit team checks the charge against what actually happened before the window to contest it closes.

Win back a deduction while the dispute window is open.

1. The momentA retailer short-pays an invoice and sends a remittance with a deduction reason code.
2. What happens todayShip notices and invoices go out, and remittances come back, as X12 EDI in each retailer's own variation, with the reason code several levels deep in the remittance. When it falls outside the mapping, the deduction shows up unexplained, and matching it to the shipment behind it takes weeks.
3. Why it mattersDeductions and chargebacks cost suppliers revenue, and retailers set deadlines for disputing them.
4. What's now possibleEach retailer's version of every ship notice, invoice, remittance, and adjustment is discovered, down to the nested reason codes, and brought into one consistent set of tables. Finance sees the reason code beside the ship notice and invoice behind it and disputes it while the dispute window is still open.